She actually looks gorgeous with no makeup. But I understand wanting to look glam sometimes too

She's a pretty girl and definately is cool without makeup, but I think she needs to tone down her night time makeup in general it's just too GLAM especially for hanging out around L.A.!

She's pretty both ways, but she looks sort of trashy with the makeup instead of beautiful when she's not wearing any!
I really like what she does on her eyes, but I agree it's a shame to hide such a beautiful skin.

With just a little powder and a little teeny, teeny bit of eye definition (about 5 pounds less than what she has on in the first picture), she'd be quite pretty! She has got to learn subtlety.

definitely no makeup

She looks good both ways. She looks so much like her mother with no makeup.

Sorry not a fan of her either way... she's just not a pretty girl in my opinion

She looks so much better without!

I like the full makeup better but I'd prefer her with a lot less as long as she was wearing some. Her face is too shiny and uneven.

You can't fairly compare an obviously bad-angled au-natual pic with a full on glam shot. My vote is still for no makeup.

Not a fan of either, sorry. She's not ugly, but she's anything but attractive to me, personally.

I think she's gorgeous both ways.

Her personality...not so much.

i think its impressive that she can look that good without makeup...

Seriously those are my only options, Skanked-Out or Homely? How about somewhere in the middle? You know like normal folk.

I think she needs to find a happy medium ... I couldn't stand her until I saw their THS ... they seem like a pretty grounded family.

She's a very pretty woman. While she looks pretty both ways, I do prefer her with out makeup or at least with less that she usually wears.

FULL

full. I think she's really pretty anyway.

She is a pretty girl both ways!

Well, I am partial to heavy duty makeup as it is, so I think she looks great with the full makeup. Beautiful!

I like her in full makeup, but she looks good without makeup, too. She has great brows!

Wow, she looks great without makeup!

How about somewhere in between? I was suprised by how pretty she is when I saw this pic. She's too pretty to wear as much makeup as she does. A little makeup would make her look amazing.

She looks like two completely different but beautiful girls. My boyfriend loves her butt.

my husband likes her butt too...but he can play with my big @$$ in the meanwhile

I guess we all have a certain fresh faced beauty and then we look good with makeup too.......in some cases lol

she looks good both ways! i really like her..dont know why, but hey!

certainly she's pretty enough w/o makeup that i wonder why she bothers with all the trouble of makeup

I said she looks good with makeup ... only because she really hasn't played up her natural beauty enough for there to be a fair comparison. If she went out looking more natural instead of just tired and glazed with sweat, I'd say her natural look is better.

I think she looks nice without, it's different then what I'm used to seeing her as. But I like her full on makeup too, it's fun and well done. I'd like to see what she'd looks like in the middle too though. A little linger and mascara maybe. She's a pretty girl

She needs a look with less makeup and fake lashes.

she is a beautiful girl she does not need make up.

She's really gorgeous without makeup at all... but goodness!
Somebody has never introduced blotting paper to the girl.
Can you say... OIL???

She looks best without makeup.

All she really needs is some mascara, a little concealer, and brow pencil to fill in her brows a bit more, and she'd be good to go.

Girlfriend looks great both ways!!

without she a natural beauty

NO MAKEUP! Kim is BEAUTIFUL! look at her! gorgeous!

If Vegas showgirl after a long decade is the look you like, then pic #1 is "prettier." As much as I love makeup — pic # 2 is waaaaay better! It goes to show that if you don't know how to put makeup on, don't use it if you can help it!

"If Vegas showgirl after a long decade is the look you like, then pic #1 is 'prettier.'"

They don't call you GiggleSugar for no reason!

Kim's looks tend to border on "female impersonator"--it's too bad, since she does have nice features.

Undecided.

Both work...

She does not need makeup, but then most of us don't.

I love the glam Kim... but I think she is pretty either way... everyone in her family has those good looks... I think a more neutral make up look would be refreshin for her...but I think she's young and she can still handle tons of make up. ( I think the older a person gets the more neutral their make up should look in order to keep themselves looking younger)

She looks great without makeup bc she is a naturally beautiful girl. However, I just think she needs to really tone down the makeup she normally wears because it is way overboard! She is too overdone.

I would love to have an even skin tone like that! She could get away with mascara and lippie.

I prefer Kim with no make-up. Generally, I prefer woman, especially naturally pretty ones, without make-up -- you can see their features in a pure form, unadulterated by anything. It's more fresh and captivating, I think.

The only woman I prefer WITH make-up is Oprah. In my opinion, she's the only person I know who looks a lot better with make-up. Perhaps it's because the only pictures I've seen of her without make-up were really unflattering. I dunno.

She's surprisingly good-looking without, but I must say that is a TERRIBLE picture. Bad angle, bad lighting, and probably not the best time for a pretty picture, either.

Furthermore, we all know how candid pictures often come out looking nowhere near as good as the person does in real life (think of how terrible pictures of you look, even though I'm sure you're a lovely woman). I bet she looks absolutely fantastic without makeup in person.

It barely even looks like her on the right! I'm so used to seeing her in full makeup.

She's lucky to have such clear skin, but I still voted for makeup, maybe I'm a little biased, I wear makeup everyday.

you should have had a 4th choice "great both with or without" because she's a beautiful young lady with or without her makeup.

i was recently in the same location as Ms. Kardashian and was kind of shocked at how tiny she actually is - her butt is not really that big! it's not nearly, in any way, as big as it appears in photos. yes, proportionally it's big compared to the rest of her, but she is a tiny girl.

shes looks great without makeup!!! i think sometimes she wears waaaay too much and she's def. naturally pretty..she should try this more often, she looks real!