L'Oréal isn't looking so good this week. The French cosmetics behemoth, which owns brands such as Maybelline, Shu Uemura, Kiehl's, Lancome, and Garnier, was found guilty of racial discrimination by La Cour de Cassation, the French equivalent of the Supreme Court. Court documents show that Garnier sales staff should be "bleu, blanc, rouge" — which describes the colors of the French flag but is coded shorthand for white French people. The London Times reports:
Prosecutors said that Garnier wanted to exclude members of the ethnic minorities on the ground that they would be less likely to sell its shampoo in French shops. The court was told that only 4.65 percent of the hostesses hired for Garnier’s campaign were black, Asian, or Arab. Before the BBR fax went out, the agency had been offering a pool of candidates in which 38.7 percent were from ethnic minorities, suggesting that they had been blocked during the final stages of recruitment.
The court's decision upholds a 2007 decision that also found L'Oréal guilty of discrimination. This isn't the first time the company has come under fire with regard to race; less than a year ago, there was controversy about whether Beyoncé's skin was retouched to be lighter. One thing's for sure: as much as L'Oréal would like people to focus on its centennial this year, this story is likely to get more traction. Photo by Foxtongue

















Rick Owens
Ralph Lauren
Kenneth Jay Lane
Am I stupid? I don't understand what happened with the flag colors. I read it a few times and still don't understand.
1Hey Amanda-La , if I am understanding correctly - the French names were short hand for L'Oréal only to use white sales associates to sell their products in shops instead of other ethnicities. L'Oréal believes that other minorities wouldn't be able to sale to women effectively.
2No wonder i stopped buying any products they hold. I'm black if you won't hire me, why should i make you rich.
3BBR is short for bleu, blanc, rouge — red, white, blue. The term is used to describe white French people as opposed to French people whose family origins are from, say, North Africa.
4Thanks Bella.
5as a french i'm not shocked...l'oreal aren't the only ones there discriminating...it's really sad since i love their products...very disappointing.
6Ah it is clear to me now. That's sad that they're discriminating against women of different races. There are so many different looking beauties, why choose only one race?
7So glad i read this. i agree amanda. I think that every shade of beauty should be represented. how disappointing. now i'll think twice before buying their products.
8yet another reminder that racial issues is a pandemic!
9I took a class on Race and Ethnicity in France and North Africa and it's a pretty sad ordeal all around that isn't anywhere near social resolution. L'Oreal is only the tip of the iceberg.
10Bleu Blanc Rouge rather than Black Blanc Beur, eh ? Shameful.
11Bienvenue en France!!
12This is horrible-- I hate hearing about unfair discrimination and racism. These brands should be empowering women, not playing favorites and being unfair.
13i'm not surprised, racial discrimination is everywhere, you can't escape it. Being an asian, I delt with racial discrimination most places i went where asians were a minority even with co-workers who couldn't even tell they were being rude and racist. It's just that they happened to find physical proof of L'oreal being racist.
14I stopped buying all brands owned by the L'Oreal company a while ago. L'Oreal's recruiting policy is simply shameful. What saddens me even more is that it is not the only company touched by the "BBR-code" scandal.
15I am never giving them my money again. They do not deserve to gain money from me. You're right "michaeluvnikita"!! I am French of Arab descent, if they don't like me or fellows, why should I make them rich?
i won't be buying anything associated with l'oreal.
16such a LOL. If they want to use white women - let them. Black women should come up with more cosmetics companies oriented at black population, there's a big gap in the market. Anyway, France is a white country, so I don't see what the big deal is.
17Hmm, I have to respectfully disagree. France is not a "white country." A day's walk around Paris will show that there are many French people with North African and Southeast Asian backgrounds, for instance. Even if there weren't people of color in France, though, discriminatory hiring practices are nothing to laugh at.
18Allytta : Obviously you've never to France! It's not as white as you think, it's quite mixed ethnically speaking. Now, the problem is not that they use white models to promote their products, but that they refuse to employ people according to their ethnical background. Which is racial discrimination, something the law forbids. You don't see what the big deal is? I do. I don't approve of the fact I may not get a job just because of my origins.
19I agree, France is NOT a white country. About a 3rd of my classmates growing up were Black, Asian or African kids, and if people abroad don't realise that then it means racist campaigns such as L'Oreal's are working, which is worrying. Discrimination is never ok, and especially not when it comes from companies popular like L'Oreal is. (hah I actually remember Ikea doing that some years ago in Marseille)
Another reason why I've stopped buying any L'Oreal-related product a while ago.
20Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.