<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>BellaSugar</title>
 <link>http://www.bellasugar.com</link>
 <description>You&#039;re beautiful. </description>
 <language>en</language>
 <atom:link href="http://www.bellasugar.com/tag/lookin%27+good+for+jesus/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
 <title>Beauty Byte: Topshop Pulls &quot;Jesus&quot; Cosmetics</title>
 <link>http://www.bellasugar.com/1038630</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bellasugar.com/1038630&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=160  src=&#039;http://media.onsugar.com/files/upl0/2/20652/07_2008/125838319_m.large.jpeg&#039;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline right&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;If you like religious kitsch, then don&#039;t plan a trip to Singapore. After receiving complaints about a cosmetics line called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blueq.com/shop/114-catId.117440633_114-productId.0.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Lookin&#039; Good For Jesus&lt;/a&gt;, Topshop has pulled all of the products from its shelves. The line features lip balm (in &quot;virtuous vanilla&quot;), bubble bath (&quot;Feel like you&#039;re walking on water!&quot;), and a &quot;King-size&quot; tote bag, among other cheeky items.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-02-12-jesus-cosmetics_N.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Catholics found the items&lt;/a&gt; &quot;disrespectful and distasteful,&quot; and Topshop has pulled all of the products. The line is from Blue Q, which also makes the Dirty Girl body-care line. It&#039;s always a little bit jokey - witness its tongue-in-cheek Queen soap - but this is the first time I remember this much of a hullabaloo over the products. Have a look below. Do you think they&#039;re offensive, or is it just good clean fun?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&#039;gallery_thumbs &#039; &gt;&lt;div class=title&gt;&lt;!-- gallery teaser  --&gt;&lt;a class=photo-count href=&#039;/gallery/226993&#039;&gt;View 7 Photos ›&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- /gallery teaser --&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.bellasugar.com/1038630#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Beauty Byte">Beauty Byte</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/blue q">blue q</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/lookin&#039; good for jesus">lookin&#039; good for jesus</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:00:48 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BellaSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.bellasugar.com/1038630</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK&#039;s ASA to ghd: FU!</title>
 <link>http://www.bellasugar.com/1121934</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bellasugar.com/1121934&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Britain&#039;s Advertising Standards Authority would like to straighten something out with hair-care company ghd. The ASA &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/mar/12/asa.advertising?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=media&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;recently banned&lt;/a&gt; ghd&#039;s latest advertising campaign, which features women praying for beautiful hair. The juxtaposition of lingerie-clad women with iconic Christian imagery didn&#039;t sit well with some viewers, and after 23 complaints, the ad was pulled. Here it is, if you want to see what the fuss is about:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/2j-ocBtKU2Q&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/2j-ocBtKU2Q&amp;hl=en&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#039;m not sure that it&#039;s the most amazing commercial I&#039;ve ever seen, but I&#039;m not sure that it&#039;s blasphemous, either. Then again, between this ad and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bellasugar.com/1038630&quot; &gt;Lookin&#039; Good For Jesus controversy&lt;/a&gt;, it seems like beauty companies might want to steer clear from adapting religious images for a while. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.bellasugar.com/1121934#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/GHD">GHD</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:00:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BellaSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.bellasugar.com/1121934</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
